GMAT優秀備考作文素材精選
The author concludes that City L has good schools, affordable housing, friendly people, flourishing arts and a safe environment. To support this claim the author cites an annual survey that ranks cities according to quality of life. Two years ago City L was listed 14th in this survey. As it stands this argument is unconvincing.
First, the author fails to indicate what individual characteristics of cities were used as criteria for the ranking. To the extent that the criteria used in the survey were the same as the features listed by the author in the conclusion, the conclusion would b warranted. On the other hand, if the survey employed entirely different criteriafor example, outdoor recreational opportunities or educational achievement levels of adult residentsthen the authors conclusion would be wholly unwarranted.
Secondly, the author provides no indication of how each characteristic was weighted in the ranking. For example, City L may have far and away the most flourishing arts scene among the cities surveyed, but it may have poor schools, unfriendly people, and an unsafe environment. The extent to which the survey accurately reflects City Ls overall quality of life in this case would depend largely on the relative weight placed on the arts as a factor affecting quality of life.
【GMAT優秀備考作文素材】相關文章：
GMAT寫作素材內容04-05
高考備考語文作文經典素材03-30
寫作備考素材六則04-05
寫作備考素材大全04-05
備考SAT的寫作素材04-05
盤點口語備考經典素材12-21
高考作文備考素材：信念12-14
教你如何略讀輕松備考GMAT閱讀題04-20
寫作素材范文.備考資料04-05